(Last edited/updated August 24, 2024)
I've just been threatened with lawsuit because of this website. It has been here since December 2019 and all information herein is/was available on the World Wide Web. This website is published in compliance with U.S. Copyright fair use since it is journalistic in nature (obviously) and I am not profiting from it in any way. (It's always about imperialism, isn't it!)
note: I often set links to open in a new tab or window.
A short excerpt of body worn camera video footage of Aurora, Colorado police brutalizing Elijah McClain in August 2019.
Note: Full video on youtube.com here
There is yet the unfinished aspect of the tragedy with the coroner violating ethics and actively participating in cover-up. When she included the notation that Elijah had "possible undiagnosed mental illness" it was meant to imply that he provoked the violence against him. The police failed with their tactical maneuver since the morbidly obese blonde woman officer wouldn't/couldn't get out of her car to get in front of him and shine light at his eyes. She instead stayed on the phone with the 911 operator & a (non-victim) caller. That was a ruse. There is an association of "mental illness" and prior (childhood) abuse, meaning that there are people in a "trauma informed" movement that voice their experiences with the psychiatric system (world wide) and the common issue is that there is already established critism of the system by prominent and respected doctors who understand that the associated conditions amount to exhibited behavioral abnormalities that can be attributed to the person being a victim of prior abuse. In effect, the coroner, was attempting to posthumously force Elijah into a different demographic of "mentally ill" who are suppressed and ignored but consist of people from diverse backgrounds (briefly). It was criminal what she did and I'm planning to continue watching for developments. My hope is to find a way to gather support to continue to push for justice.
( ↑ The independent investigation team referenced the "Terry Stop" law too and that the actions of the police were not congruent with the implementation of that sort of contact; the encounter was treated more as an apprehension.)
I can't emphasize enough that although the Colorado 17th District Attorney is insistent that "...the force applied during the altercation was within policy and consistent with training"; at some point there was a failure of their adherence to policy or procedure since a defenseless & innocent young man died from their physical handling of him. There was one officer at the scene (for instance) that didn't do anything but sit in a car until after Elijah was attacked and it seems like that one could have placed herself in front of him so their intent to stop him would be more obvious. If they had an officer directly in front of him to shine a light in his eyes he would have had to stop; that seems cruel in itself but would've better than immediately grabbing him. They should have also verbally announced to Elijah that they were city police and weren't arresting him at that point but needed him to stop so they could verify his identification. In that way they were prejudice because they obviously assumed that he would be experienced enough with police to know that they wouldn't just let him continue walking once they insisted that he stop. They seemed to have an expedient (yet uncoordinated & arrogant) attitude about it but then of course they physically escalated to outright violence in order to overpower him.
There is another detail to the police stop that is important to address and that is the fact that the items he had in the bag were store bought food and so would've noticeably not been stolen goods of any kind from a burglary. The actual contents of the bag wouldn't coincide with him being "sketchy", is the word used by a caller. At that point the police (should have) had more understanding of his behavior and had a period of time to reconsider their suspicion and actions but instead continued to careen forward, indifferent of the contradictory information that they had available to them that the caller did not have. It becomes apparent that they were convinced that they could somehow justify their ongoing onslaught like there's always some way out. The county coroner finished their cover-up by providing the "undiagnosed mental illness" label in her report which amounts to what's equivalent to a throw-down gun to blame him. (Here is a copy of Elijah McClain's Autopsy Report.) Most people may not be aware that using the label of "mentally ill" to describe anyone is controversial and contested even among prominent sociologists, psychologists, and psychiatrists worldwide. If the Adams County Coroner wants to maintain her opinion on the issue then I would point out that studies have revealed that people with mental disorders are more often victims of crime than perpetrators and so Elijah's case is validation of that when considering the violent crime committed against him by the police.
He could have been wearing the mask because of a disfigurement or skin condition but none of those officers (out of all of them that were involved) didn't make any mention of that which reflects lack of experience and adequate oversight. He was also "flailing his arms about" but it was a summer evening and there can be swarms of gnats or mosquitoes around. The call(s) that the police received were about Elijah looking suspicious but they didn't stay objective and instead got caught up in cultural hysteria.
From my experience in the military I know that men of African descent can have difficulties with Pseudofolliculitis barbae and I would personally first assume that wearing the mask was part of Elijah's personal treatment. With that in mind it's easy to discern that he did take steps to minimize the oddity of wearing the mask in the summer by being out in the late evening, and in relatively cooler weather, to do an errand. The street he was walking along is also in the vicinity of a freeway corridor so it could get dusty in that area. The district attorney didn't impart any contradictory evidence in his press announcement exonerating the police so facts were obscured that could potentially sway public opinion.
In a densely populated area there will occasionally be someone out & about that looks a bit strange and Elijah may have been aware of that but knew that the only real (legal) reason he could be stopped by the police is if he happened to match a description of someone who committed a crime in the area which would be very coincidental. If the police announced to him that was the case he might've stopped (but of course we'll never know) but my point is this: people don't understand that when a man is in a situation like that he can have a basic understanding of what exactly his rights are and so the announcement that "he was being suspicious" did not qualify for the reasonable suspicion standard so he did not immediately comply. It was that lack of immediate compliance which cost him his life but was based on misinformation from the officer ("I have a right to stop you...") which would be confusing. It was disrespectful & unreasonable of the officer to expect to be able to infringe on Elijah's natural right to his liberty without one moment's hesitation. From a sociology standpoint, it was the police who ultimately had control of the situation but were obviously complacent and so were relying on Elijah to accommodate them by compromising his equality which was guaranteed him by the U.S. Constitution.
Note: I am also aware of the events with the paramedics and other medical personnel which, of course, is beyond my expertise. I would like to point out that from my own experience, knowledge, & research that when a person is inebriated it can be easier for them to relax their muscles than it is for someone who is sober (which is the reason drunk people will often sustain relatively less physical injury in car accidents); and in Elijah's case it very well could have been impossible for him to relax his muscles under the circumstances, especially once his adrenaline increased. When the officer said "... relax or I'm going to have to change this situation" what he obviously meant was that he was going to take control of the scene; so in other words, it was an admittance (parapraxis) that they didn't have control previously. An innocent man died in police custody and people commenting on the event in social media often used forms of the word "arrest" which reveals just how misinformed people in the general public are. The point then becomes about how Elijah could've been expected to know exactly what to do when there isn't any consistent, mandatory education regarding police contacts as a pedestrian. It's clear that the Colorado 17th District Attorney in office at the time, Dave Young needs to be brought up on federal criminal charges for his dereliction and neglect while relying on the current public opinion.
Maybe I'll point out too that police get college degrees to help them advance into supervisor positions and the courses would inevitably include some form of social science or cultural studies education. That kind of material would've been introduced as a result of past police reform movements for diversity training and cultural sensitivity (doing an internet search on that topic yields myriad scholarly articles) but it's up to police officers themselves to apply the information in their job. The juxtaposition of Elijah wearing a ski mask but carrying the white shopping bag is something that should've been taken into account. The deliberate misinterpretation and/or exaggeration of someone's noncriminal behavior that doesn't conform to what is considered cultural norm is an issue that has affected people in the mental & behavioral health community for decades. There is sometimes the point (as in Elijah's tradegy) where a number of people collude to outright deny the fact that although it was admitted that he committed no crime he was still treated that way; not because he was suspicious but because he looked suspicious. > There is a subtle difference there but the way I can explain it is that there became a mission to teach him that his lack of conformity was irritating to some people. I would hope that anyone who personally knew him that may see this association that I've introduced here will not consider it demeaning to the young man. There are many people in the trauma informed community who are very compassionate and there are even some prodigies.
Elijah's last words ...
"I can't breathe. I have my ID right here. My name is Elijah McClain. That's my house. I was just going home. I'm an introvert. I'm just different. That's all. I'm so sorry. I have no gun. I don't do that stuff. I don't do any fighting. Why are you attacking me? I don't even kill flies! I don't eat meat! But I don't judge people, I don't judge people who do eat meat. Forgive me. All I was trying to do was become better. I will do it. I will do anything. Sacrifice my identity, I'll do it. You all are phenomenal. You are beautiful and I love you. Try to forgive me. I'm a mood Gemini. I'm sorry. I'm so sorry. Ow, that really hurt! You are all very strong. Teamwork makes the dream work. Oh, I'm sorry, I wasn't trying to do that. I just can't breathe correctly."
At around 10 pm on August 24 the temperature was approximately 70° F; not 95° F like I seen someone comment ...(first comment by User from CO on this article)...
If men were angels, no government would be necessary.
~ James Madison
note: I am not affiliated with the family or advocates of Elijah McClain and I'm not requesting nor expecting any compensation for the publication of this website. Contact admin at this domain (dot org) with inquiries.
I changed the cover image for this page to include Matty Miller's artwork. Seynab @earthsignsey & Kim BLM Boredon @manobjectifier on Twitter mentioned that images of him in the hospital were unnecessarily graphic so I covered one I had there.
Note: this is copy of the new text that I have on the redirection page:
Oh ... it's "Cole v. Arkansas :: 333 U.S. 196 (1948)" that I'd first mention in any civil proceedings against me as a result of this website, and point out that blocking a freeway would be included with "prevention of a person by means of force and violence from engaging in lawful vocation". It was by felonous means that the general public was intimidated and threatened by young people in "flash mobs" that could only be possible using the internet. The internet is public intrastructure (now) and any resulting monetary settlement could be contestable since it was acquired by extortion. In lieu of distancing themselves from the criminal actions of obstructing freeways, the lawyers profited from the mob's techniques. There were innocent human beings trapped in cars and denied access to emergency personnel who could've been there if it were a traffic accident. A driver could've had conditions, i.e., prior trauma, that could exacerbated their fear and led to physical symptoms. The issue of course is that is the whole point is that younger, healthier people got to terrorize older people and it was exciting and fun for them. That is "Schadenfreude" or see: Proverbs 24:17 "Do not rejoice when your enemy falls, and do not let your heart be glad when he stumbles". (I realize that the people stuck in vehicles aren't "the enemy" but they were treated as such by being held hostage in such a way. It was a kind of false imprisonment.) Any lawyer who doesn't immediately distance themselves from the "protestors" tactics are condoning felonous acts against vulnerable people and they get paid to do that. How is that ethical?
Here is a copy of the text of a comment that was made on a recent post on Party for Socialism and Liberation - Denver Facebook page (RE: "August 29th community discussion" posted 08/23/2024 at 12:15pm).
@ Eliza Lucero ... Just to note that the blocking freeways "peacefully" has already been described as crime in relatable federal case long ago. Terrorizing innocent people by forcing them into a "false imprisonment" scenario (pedestrians aren't allowed on freeway so abandoning their car to go pee would be illegal) but although "it's just like being stuck for an accident" there are no public funded emergency crews that are accessible to anyone elderly, disabled, etc. that might be there stuck in their car. Y'all got Jennifer Watson to flip out but maybe she suffered some trauma in her life, but even young liberal women couldn't care less since anything not having something to do with getting their hedonistic desires satisfied is a distraction and so therefor is ignored. All the lawyers that condone blocking freeways should be disbarred.
Cole v. Arkansas, 333 U.S. 196 (1948)
"...includes two offenses,first, the concert of action between two or more persons resulting in the prevention of a person by means of force and violence from engaging.in a lawful vocation."
There's issues with incompetent and unethical apartment property managers that I know about and some legitimate complaints to various gov't oversight agencies (HUD and DORA) were dismissed. That was even after a DORA agent was informed of what a HUD equal rights specialist did to her own daughter. It's all documented but everybody ignores. I advocate for the demographic of mental health community, clients & staff, and these landlords would insist on meeting with some residents on monthly basis (to pay rent because they couldn't/wouldn't adjust their online payment system to account for gov't housing subsidy. The landlords wanted an opportunity to play social worker & financial advisor to vulnerable people on gov't assistance, and of course violate the recipients privacy in the process, since it's something anybody'd do. offscour.net/
I will continue to do further research & work on the webpage contents. Please check back for updates.
"We want and are entitled to the basic rights and opportunities of American citizens: The right to earn a living at work for which we are fitted by training and ability; equal opportunities in education, health, recreation, and similar public services; the right to vote; equality before the law; some of the same courtesy and good manners that we ourselves bring to all human relations."
~ (Dr.) Martin Luther King, Jr. from August 6, 1946 letter to editor of Atlanta newspaper.
The biggest danger to our rights today is not from government acting against the will of the majority
but from government which has become the mere instrument of this majority...
Wrong will be done as much by an all-powerful people as by an all-powerful prince.
~ James Madison
Class conflict is another concept which upsets the oppressors, since they do not wish to consider themselves an oppressive class. Unable to deny, try as they may, the existence of social classes, they preach the need for understanding and harmony between those who buy and those who are obliged to sell their labor. However, the unconcealable antagonism which exists between the two classes makes this "harmony" impossible. ~ Paulo Freire
"Only a lively appreciation of dissent's vital function at all levels of society can preserve it as a corrective to wishful thinking, self-inflation, and unperceived rigidity"
The Wrong Way Home : Uncovering the patterns of cult behavior in American society | by Arthur J. Deikman, M.D
ISBN 10: 0807029157 ISBN 13: 9780807029152
Force has no place where there is need of skill.
~ Herodotus
Photograph of my old department crewmembers & I displaying our
Battle Efficiency Award onboard the now decommissioned USS Wabash AOR-5
One of my more recent projects was converting scanned magazine articles to digital text and one in a Colorado History magazine (printed in 1973) included an article about Junius R. Lewis. There was an injustice committed against him that entailed gender issues as well as the racism that he had to contend with. It's a fascinating story! (The article includes references so converting it to EPUB3 with audio reader capability is an aspect that needs work.)